NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission
Student Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX 6030 MSN Practicum and Capstone
Prof. Name
Date
Abstract
This capstone project examined strategies to reduce avoidable emergency department (ED) utilization among high-risk Kaiser Permanente members by embedding medical assistants (MAs) within home-based primary care operations. The intervention centralized incoming communications from Complete Home Care under trained MAs to improve coordination and responsiveness. The primary objective was to ensure that triage requests, verbal order processing, referrals, medication reconciliations, and related clinical inquiries were completed within a two-hour window.
A comparative analysis was conducted between the traditional Kaiser Permanente centralized call center model and the proposed MA-led workflow integrated into home-based primary care. Findings indicated that direct MA management significantly improved turnaround times by eliminating intermediate routing delays. The results support the conclusion that integrating medical assistants into home-based care improves service efficiency, strengthens care coordination, and may contribute to a reduction in preventable ED visits.
Introduction
This project addresses inefficiencies in managing high-risk Kaiser Permanente members, particularly the frequent use of emergency services for non-urgent conditions. The intervention focuses on embedding medical assistants into home-based primary care to streamline communication and manage incoming patient requests from Complete Home Care.
The model is structured around three core components:
- Routine health monitoring to detect early clinical deterioration
- Patient education to promote self-management and adherence
- Care coordination to ensure timely clinical responses
Implementation emphasizes interdisciplinary teamwork, standardized workflows, and timely follow-ups. Effectiveness is evaluated through reduced response times, improved coordination, and decreased emergency department utilization. The overarching aim is to improve accessibility, quality, and continuity of care in a sustainable manner.
Problem Statement (PICOT)
Need Assessment
High-risk Kaiser Permanente members often experience delays in triage, referral processing, verbal order approvals, and medication reconciliation, which can extend beyond clinically acceptable timeframes. These delays contribute to avoidable ED utilization and increased healthcare costs. For context, CMS expenditures on emergency care exceeded $5.2 billion in 2010 (Jasani et al., 2023).
Frequent ED reliance for non-emergent needs reflects inefficiencies in primary care responsiveness. Research suggests that medical assistant integration in home-based care significantly improves response times and operational efficiency (Alesi et al., 2023). Compared to the traditional centralized call center model, direct MA handling reduces communication lag and enhances coordination.
Population and Setting
The target population includes high-risk Kaiser Permanente members who demonstrate frequent, non-urgent ED use. Analysis of over five million encounters revealed inaccuracies in triage severity classification, with underestimation in 3% of cases and overestimation in approximately 25% (Greene, 2023).
The intervention is implemented within Kaiser Permanente’s home-based primary care setting, enabling direct patient monitoring and rapid response. Structured triage workflows are intended to ensure all service requests are resolved within two hours, improving continuity and reducing unnecessary ED visits (Jasani et al., 2023).
Intervention Overview
The intervention introduces medical assistants as primary coordinators for incoming home-care calls. Their responsibilities include:
- Triage support and symptom screening
- Referral coordination
- Verbal order documentation
- Medication reconciliation
This structure reduces system inefficiencies and improves patient flow (Savioli et al., 2022). The model aligns with home-based primary care principles by emphasizing accessibility, continuity, and timely intervention (Mahan et al., 2020). Although implementation requires workforce training and system integration, it offers significant improvements in care delivery and resource utilization.
Comparison of Approaches
| Feature | Medical Assistant-Led Home Care | Telehealth-Driven Model |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Function | Direct coordination of patient calls | Virtual triage and monitoring |
| Patient Interaction | Hybrid (phone + home-based) | Fully virtual |
| Accessibility | High for home-care patients | High for remote populations |
| Limitations | Staffing and training demands | Digital access barriers |
| Strength | Faster internal coordination | Geographic flexibility |
The telehealth model provides scalable remote access and improves coordination efficiency (Kobeissi & Ruppert, 2021). However, it may be less effective for patients requiring physical assessment or those with limited digital literacy. Conversely, MA-led home care enhances personalization but requires greater operational resources.
Initial Outcome Draft
The expected outcome of this intervention is a measurable reduction in ED visits through faster resolution of clinical requests. By centralizing call management with medical assistants, delays associated with traditional routing systems are minimized.
Key outcomes include:
- Reduced response times (≤ 2 hours)
- Improved care coordination
- Lower ED utilization
- Increased patient satisfaction
These outcomes align with structured workflow optimization and interdisciplinary collaboration goals (Mahan et al., 2020).
Time Estimate
| Phase | Duration | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|
| Planning | Week 1–2 | Data review, workflow design, protocol development |
| Training | Week 2 | MA training, pilot testing |
| Implementation | Week 3 | Full deployment of MA call management |
| Evaluation | Week 4 | KPI measurement and performance analysis |
Potential barriers include training delays, staffing limitations, and resistance to workflow change.
Literature Review
Research consistently demonstrates that inefficient ED utilization is linked to delays in primary care access and care coordination breakdowns (Sartini et al., 2022). Embedding medical assistants into care teams improves responsiveness and reduces administrative bottlenecks (Gray, 2021).
Evidence indicates that more than half of ED visits may be preventable with timely intervention (Greene, 2023). Structured care models improve workflow efficiency and patient outcomes while reducing system strain (Savioli et al., 2022). Additionally, integrated communication roles such as medical assistants enhance continuity and reduce fragmentation in care delivery (Kobeissi & Ruppert, 2021).
Evaluation and Synthesis of Health Policies
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) supports preventive care models that reduce unnecessary hospital utilization (Giannouchos et al., 2021). Its emphasis on care coordination and chronic disease management aligns with this intervention.
Key policy influences include:
- Value-based care reimbursement models
- EHR interoperability requirements
- Telehealth expansion policies
These frameworks support the integration of technology-enabled home care, though financial and infrastructure barriers remain.
Interventional Plan
Core Components
- Health Monitoring: Routine assessment of vital signs and symptoms
- Patient Education: Chronic disease self-management support
- Care Coordination: Integration across providers and services
These components improve early detection of deterioration and reduce ED dependence (Zimbroff et al., 2021).
Outcome Measures
- ED visit reduction
- Response time compliance (≤ 2 hours)
- Patient satisfaction scores
- Referral completion rates
Cultural Needs and Population Characteristics
The target population is culturally and linguistically diverse, requiring tailored communication strategies. Many patients face barriers such as language limitations and chronic disease burden.
Key adaptations include:
- Multilingual educational materials
- Culturally responsive communication training for staff
- Interpreter-supported care delivery (Cox & Maryns, 2021)
These strategies ensure equitable access and improved engagement in home-based care.
Theoretical Foundations
Health Promotion Model (HPM)
The HPM explains how beliefs and self-efficacy influence health behaviors. It supports individualized education and behavioral reinforcement strategies (Jalali et al., 2025).
Transtheoretical Model (TTM)
The TTM categorizes patients based on readiness for behavioral change and guides tailored interventions (Imeri et al., 2021). However, it may oversimplify nonlinear behavioral patterns.
Telehealth Integration
Virtual care enhances monitoring and access but depends on patient digital literacy and infrastructure availability (Kobeissi & Ruppert, 2021).
Implementation Plan
Leadership and Management
Successful implementation depends on structured collaboration between physicians, nurses, and medical assistants. Clear role definition and communication systems are essential (Tsai et al., 2020).
Delivery Methods
| Method | Function |
|---|---|
| Telehealth | Remote triage and consultation |
| Home Visits | In-person assessments |
| Mobile Health | Ongoing patient monitoring |
This hybrid model improves access while reducing ED burden (Gellert et al., 2023).
Technology Integration
Key technologies include:
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
- Telehealth platforms
- AI-supported triage tools
- Wearable monitoring devices
These systems enhance data-driven decision-making but require further validation for reliability in complex clinical scenarios (Hamm et al., 2020).
Evaluation Plan
Data Collection Methods
- EHR timestamp tracking
- Patient satisfaction surveys
- Pre- and post-intervention comparisons
Key Metrics
| Metric | Measurement Type |
|---|---|
| Response time | Quantitative |
| ED utilization | Quantitative |
| Patient satisfaction | Qualitative |
| Referral completion | Operational |
Statistical analysis (e.g., SPSS) will assess outcome significance (Masuadi et al., 2021).
Discussion
Advocacy
Nurses serve as central advocates in improving care coordination and reducing system inefficiencies. Their role includes patient education, workflow coordination, and interdisciplinary communication (Flaubert, 2021).
Future Steps
Future expansion may include:
- Remote patient monitoring integration
- AI-based triage systems
- Predictive analytics for risk identification
- Expanded telehealth services (Dubey & Tiwari, 2023)
These enhancements support proactive and preventive care delivery.
Conclusion
This project demonstrates that integrating medical assistants into home-based primary care significantly improves care coordination, reduces response times, and decreases unnecessary emergency department utilization. The model supports efficient, patient-centered care delivery and aligns with value-based healthcare principles. Its scalability and adaptability make it a viable strategy for improving outcomes among high-risk populations.
References
Alder, S. (2025). HIPAA guidelines on telemedicine. HIPAA Journal. https://www.hipaajournal.com/hipaa-guidelines-on-telemedicine/
Alesi, A., Bortolin, Ragazzoni, & Castronuovo. (2023). Primary health care and disasters: Applying a “whole-of-health system” approach through reverse triage in mass-casualty management. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 38(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x23006246
Cox, A., & Maryns, K. (2021). Multilingual consultations in urgent medical care. The Translator, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2020.1857501
Dubey, A., & Tiwari, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: A literature review. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2205618
Fernandes, A., & Ray, J. V. (2023). Improving the safety and effectiveness of urgent and emergency care. Future Healthcare Journal, 10(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2023-0085
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission
Ferreira, D. C., Vieira, I., Pedro, M. I., Caldas, P., & Varela, M. (2023). Patient satisfaction with healthcare services and the techniques used for its assessment: A systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Healthcare, 11(5), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050639
Flaubert, J. L. (2021). The role of nurses in improving health care access and quality. In The Future of Nursing 2020–2030. National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573910/
Gellert, G. A., Socha, J., Marcjasz, N., Price, T., Heyduk, A., & Orzechowski, P. (2023). The role of virtual triage in improving clinician experience and satisfaction: A narrative review. Telemedicine Reports, 4(1), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0020
Giannouchos, T. V., Kum, H.-C., Gary, J. C., Morrisey, M. A., & Ohsfeldt, R. L. (2021). The effect of expanded insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act on emergency department utilization in New York. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 48, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.076
Gjellestad, Å., Oksholm, T., Alvsvåg, H., & Bruvik, F. (2022). Autonomy conquers all: A thematic analysis of nurses’ professional judgement encountering resistance to care from home-dwelling persons with dementia. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08123-x
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission
Gray, M. (2021). An expanded role for the medical assistant in primary care: Evaluating a training pilot. The Permanente Journal, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/20.091
Greene, J. (2023, March 17). Widely used triage method overestimates severity of a quarter of emergency department patients. Kaiser Permanente Division of Research. https://divisionofresearch.kaiserpermanente.org/triage-method-overestimates-severity/
Hamm, J. M., Greene, C., Sweeney, M., Mohammadie, S., Thompson, L. B., Wallace, E., & Schrading, W. (2020). Telemedicine in the emergency department in the era of COVID-19: Front-line experiences from 2 institutions. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 1(6), 163. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12204
Hui, K., Gilmore, C. J., & Khan, M. (2020). Medical records: More than the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 121(4), 770–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2020.06.022
Imeri, H., Toth, J., Arnold, A., & Barnard, M. (2021). Use of the transtheoretical model in medication adherence: A systematic review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.008
Jalali, A., Rajati, F., & Kazeminia, M. (2025). Empowering older people on self-care to improve self-efficacy based on Pender’s health promotion model: A randomized controlled trial. Geriatric Nursing, 61, 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.12.020
Jasani, G., Liang, Y., McNeilly, B., Stryckman, B., Marcozzi, D., & Gingold, D. (2023). Association between primary care availability and emergency medical services utilization. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 64(4), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.01.002
Kobeissi, M. M., & Ruppert, S. D. (2021). Remote patient triage. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 34(3), 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000000655
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission
Mahan, M., Vacharathit, V., Falvo, A., Dove, J., Parker, D., Gabrielsen, J., Daouadi, M., Shabahang, M., Petrick, A., & Horsley, R. (2020). Emergency department overutilization following cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair. Surgical Endoscopy, 35, 4750–4755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07949-y
Masuadi, E., Mohamud, M., Almutairi, M., Alsunaidi, A., Alswayed, A. K., & Aldhafeeri, O. F. (2021). Trends in the usage of statistical software and their associated study designs in health sciences research: A bibliometric analysis. Cureus, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12639
Milton, J., Andersson, A., Åberg, N. D., Gillespie, B. M., & Oxelmark, L. (2022). Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in the emergency department: A critical incident study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01034-0
Sartini, M., Carbone, A., Demartini, A., Giribone, L., Oliva, M., Spagnolo, A. M., Cremonesi, P., Canale, F., & Cristina, M. L. (2022). Overcrowding in emergency department: Causes, consequences, and solutions—a narrative review. Healthcare, 10(9), 1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091625
Savioli, G., Ceresa, I. F., Gri, N., Piccini, G., Longhitano, Y., Zanza, C., Piccioni, A., Esposito, C., Ricevuti, G., & Bressan, M. A. (2022). Emergency department overcrowding: Understanding the factors to find corresponding solutions. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020279
Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020). Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: A scoping review and qualitative content analysis. Life, 10(12), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327
NURS FPX 6030 Assessment 6 Final Project Submission
Wadhwa, R., & Boehning, A. P. (2023). The Joint Commission. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557846/
Webb, A. (2024). Value-based care. Nursing, 55(2), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/nsg.0000000000000133
Zhang, X., & Saltman, R. (2021). Impact of electronic health record interoperability on telehealth service outcomes. Medical Informatics, 10(1), e31837. https://doi.org/10.2196/31837
Zimbroff, R. M., Ornstein, K. A., & Sheehan, O. C. (2021). Home-based primary care: A systematic review of the literature, 2010–2020. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(10), 2963–2972. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17365
